Hi Gregor, gregor herrmann wrote: >On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 13:37:19 +0100, Torsten Jerzembeck wrote: >> Using Mail::SPF::Query with an IPv6 enabled mailserver (increasingly >> common today, and bound to get even more common due to the shortage of >> IPv4 addresses) leads to mail being blocked incorrectly. >Could you please give an example of a domain/mailserver which uses >IPv6 and SPF? I'd like to do some tests and it would be easier with >an example :)
In my installation the bug was triggered by mail from an user of the
domain "marzen.de":
t...@falcon:~$ dig txt marzen.de
[...]
;; ANSWER SECTION:
marzen.de. 3510 IN TXT "v=spf1 a mx
ip6:2001:6f8:98b::/48
ip4:192.109.53.0/24 -all"
[...]
t...@falcon:~$ dig mx marzen.de
[...]
;; ANSWER SECTION:
marzen.de. 3475 IN MX 10 mail.marzen.de.
marzen.de. 3475 IN MX 20 postfix.saar.de.
marzen.de. 3475 IN MX 30 mail2.marzen.de.
[...]
;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
mail.marzen.de. 3475 IN A 193.141.107.90
mail.marzen.de. 3475 IN AAAA 2001:6f8:98b::a42:3592
postfix.saar.de. 153236 IN A 192.109.53.18
postfix.saar.de. 153236 IN AAAA 2001:4dd0:ff7f::18
mail2.marzen.de. 3475 IN A 192.109.53.242
>> The "spfquery" helper script used in the example configuration for exim4
>Hm, the file shipped in the package
>(/usr/share/doc/libmail-spf-query-perl/examples/exim-acl) doesn't use
>spfquery but spfd. #376545 suggests an alternative which uses
>spfquery.
I think that this part of my setup is rather old, and I don't know any
more why I decided to go this way rather than using spfd, unfortunately.
Many thanks for your quick action in this case!
Greetings from Bad Cannstatt,
=ToJe=
--
Torsten Jerzembeck * Oberschlesische Str. 61 * D-70374 Stuttgart
Exil-Westfale * PGP: B74DB58D * MIME welcome * Generation Tux * ><o(((°>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
