On Mo, 2010-12-13 at 21:22 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 11:46:38PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > > I've prepared an NMU for python-apt (versioned as 0.7.100+nmu1) and
> > > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> > > should delay it longer.
> >
> > People forget things, so remind people. Directly doing an NMU on a bug
> > with a single message only (the initial report) is overreaction. Send an
> > email, ping us on IRC (#debian-apt), but DO NOT NMU. I appreciate that
> > you want to help, but NMU mails just make our both lifes more
> > complicated than they have to be.
> 
> I beg to disagree. Please note that what Gregor did is perfectly within
> the scope of Developer Reference guidelines for when, how, and which
> DELAYED/XX queue to use when doing NMUs [1].
Well, he lost time writing the patch, building the package, and
uploading it, and I lost time writing the email (and it was close to
midnight). Had I been informed earlier that day, I would have just built
and uploaded a new package and been happy about doing useful things.
-- 
Julian Andres Klode  - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member

See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/.





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to