On Mo, 2010-12-13 at 21:22 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 11:46:38PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > > I've prepared an NMU for python-apt (versioned as 0.7.100+nmu1) and > > > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I > > > should delay it longer. > > > > People forget things, so remind people. Directly doing an NMU on a bug > > with a single message only (the initial report) is overreaction. Send an > > email, ping us on IRC (#debian-apt), but DO NOT NMU. I appreciate that > > you want to help, but NMU mails just make our both lifes more > > complicated than they have to be. > > I beg to disagree. Please note that what Gregor did is perfectly within > the scope of Developer Reference guidelines for when, how, and which > DELAYED/XX queue to use when doing NMUs [1]. Well, he lost time writing the patch, building the package, and uploading it, and I lost time writing the email (and it was close to midnight). Had I been informed earlier that day, I would have just built and uploaded a new package and been happy about doing useful things. -- Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member
See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org