On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 21:17:33 +0000, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > The question is if the plugin is a derived work of both the GPL 2 only > libpoppler and the GPL 3 only application. Since it can't exist > without either then it almost certainly is. And since the licences > are incompatible that makes it illegal to distribute. > It doesn't sound like this has been addressed?
Cheers, Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
