* Jan Niehusmann [Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:25:09 +0200]:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 01:47:49AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not
> > be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will
> > read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay
> > their upload.
> Not a strong reason, but something to consider: The only package I know
> which did depend on qssl in the past was psi. At the moment, qssl could
> simply be removed, and if nobody speaks up in the next few weeks, I'll
> probably ask the ftp masters to do so.
Do you feel it necessary to wait a few weeks? I mean, unless you ask
the people who could be interested in it, almost anybody is going to
be reading this bug report.
So, what about if I file a bug removal now?
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
Listening to: Mª Dolores Pradera - La enorme distancia
Any life, no matter how long and complex it may be, is made up of a
single moment: the moment in which a man finds out, once and for all,
who he is.
-- Jorge Luis Borges
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
