On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 02:47:31PM +0200, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> Every thing looks correct on your system.
> 
> Can you please send me the output of "aptitude show binutils"?

[~]# dpkg -l 'binutils*'
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name                      Version                   Description
+++-=========================-=========================-==================================================================
ii  binutils                  2.21.0.20110327-2         The GNU assembler, 
linker and binary utilities
un  binutils-doc              <none>                    (no description 
available)
ii  binutils-gold             2.21.0.20110327-2         The (experimental) GNU 
gold linker utility
un  binutils-multiarch        <none>                    (no description 
available)

> I suspect you are using binutils-gold, didn't you?

Indeed.

And this was the problem, with the traditional linker executables compiled
with fpc work again.


-- 
1KB             // Microsoft corollary to Hanlon's razor:
                //      Never attribute to stupidity what can be
                //      adequately explained by malice.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to