> it's a great thing to have a debian package for go. And since you are
> keeping up with the weekly releases I don't need to build from upstream
> myself anymore. One thing less I need to care about at work; thanks for
> that and keep up the good work. Good decision to include the source and
> documentation too, since I need both for reference and the one at their
> webpage is only up to date with their last stable release.
>
> It would be nice to see the stable releases (those tagged "release" in
> upstream) in testing too. Maybe consider "resolving" this bug for the
> next stable upstream release and reopen it for the weely release after that.
> The stable releases don't seem to happen that often (the last is about 2
> month old) and the API changes aren't that bad, so having the latest and
> greatest golang release in the next stable would be a good thing imho.

Seems like good idea - could you ping me when there is a release tag?

The only reason why to remove golang from testing is to not have it in
stable, so what I can do is to let it into testing, but remove it
after freeze.

> Besides... ...gccgo just migrated to testing and its a pain to use, so
> it would be nice if people using wheezy had the choice to use golang
> alternatively (if they don't want to use sid, or just aren't aware of
> the package in sid). No matter how bad the situation turns out to be, it
> will be still an inprovement for those using wheezy.

> PS.: If you need a helping hand with anything regarding these packages,
> no matter what the task is, just ask.

There seems to be a bug with dynamic linker with libc6 from
experimental :). It would be great if you can solve that.

And you can always send pull requests for git.

O.
-- 
Ondřej Surý <ond...@sury.org>



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to