-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/29/2011 04:05 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > Hi, > >> * Moritz Mühlenhoff <muehlenh...@univention.de> [2011-02-14 10:27:55 CET]: >>> Am Montag 14 Februar 2011 04:24:35 schrieb John Lightsey: >>>> Yes, I can reproduce the FTBFS with 1.14. This was corrected upstream >>>> with 1.16 which is already in testing and unstable. The newer version >>>> doesn't include adjusted prices in any tests since Yahoo changes these >>>> periodically. >>> >>> I've cherrypicked the upstream test suite fixes from 1.16 and now the >>> build succeeds. >> >> Moritz, can you name which upstream commits are needed to fix this? >> >> John, what are your plans to get this fixed in squeeze? I just tested, >> the package still FTBFS in squeeze, and in the case of a potential >> needed security or otherwise related update, this *really* needs to get >> fixed for squeeze, too. > > Hi Gerfried, > > Patch is attached.
This is essentially every change in 1.16 except the changelog and the version number bump. IMHO it would be better to simply put 1.16 into squeeze if this is truly worth fixing. My reading of 5.5.1 in the developers reference doesn't suggest to me that a FTBFS by itself merits a stable update, but if I'm mistaken in that belief I'd be happy to put 1.16 into stable. John -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk27VQMACgkQBYeybkXz+/k1UACfebTgcZ5aG9KenL5zdqdyaFfv UAIAn0YnsmuWhi74yePm97aGEtw3s6J8 =iV1j -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
