Hi,
> I think it is okay, unless you decide that having a relative path for
> the shell is a security risk and you don't want to support this. But
> yours would be the only program (as far as I am aware) that chuckles on
> this problem. As I said, before correcting it now, I had this mistake
> working for years (since 2001 at least).
>
I'm a bit uneasy; but anyway I'll search the path.
The main problem with 'SHELL' is that it's so
used in many programs and it's not clearly defined...
regards,
junichi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
