Your message dated Fri, 23 Sep 2005 23:54:30 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libgnomeuimm2.0 and libglademm2.0 removed from testing/unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Aug 2005 06:37:25 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 18 23:37:25 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-038.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (quetzlcoatl.dodds.net)
[66.93.39.38]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E60VJ-0005dp-00; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 23:37:25 -0700
Received: by quetzlcoatl.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 545063AEB; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 23:37:23 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libglademm2.0: builds a library package with the same name and
different ABI
on rebuild
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 23:37:19 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: libglademm2.0
Severity: serious
libglademm2.0-1c102 is a shared library that exports C++ interfaces,
which means that it must undergo the transition described at
<http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/07/msg00001.html> if
the package is to remain in Debian.
However, since this library package appears to be superseded by
libglademm2.4 and has only trivial non-library reverse-dependencies, I
have no intention of NMUing this package. Instead, if no one speaks up
to indicate that the library is still needed, I will request the removal
of libgnomeuimm2.0 and libglademm2.0 from unstable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: alpha
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-generic
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 323895-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Sep 2005 06:54:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 23 23:54:31 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (tennyson.dodds.net)
[66.93.39.86]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EJ3vb-0008WH-00; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 23:54:31 -0700
Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 1DA26704D; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 23:54:30 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 23:54:30 -0700
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libgnomeuimm2.0 and libglademm2.0 removed from testing/unstable
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
libgnomeuimm2.0 and libglademm2.0 are obsolete and have been removed from
both testing and unstable at the request of the release team, so these bugs
are no longer relevant.
Cheers,
--=20
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDNPgmKN6ufymYLloRAuVeAJ4q08ZSnK5z/FPPOu5ugqSdH2k7agCdG69F
A6tYunUZRzIu7iPIcrA5umA=
=Iiy+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
