On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 09:48:09 (CEST), Alessio Treglia wrote: > Version: 1.9.1+svn479~dfsg0-1 > > On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Christian Marillat <maril...@debian.org> > wrote: >> *-dev package should be architecture any as files are binary dependant. > > debian/control says: > > Package: libmp4v2-dev > Section: libdevel > Architecture: all > Depends: > > Hence, closing.
The reporter is right that -dev packages should be arch:any, not arch:all. Even if the current libmp4v2-dev package doesn't ship any architecture dependent files, the resulting churn from buildd skew (i.e., the situation when the buildds for some architectures are slow, this results in the library being uninstallable when the -dev package is superseeded with a new upload) is really not worth saving a few kbytes on the archive mirrors. I've done that change in git already. Cheers, Reinhard -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org