On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:05:17AM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > I note that, at least on i386, the build wound up picking up > libghc-persistent-dev 0.6.1-1+b1 rather than the current (and > presumably corresponding) 0.6.2-1; perhaps a tighter build dependency > is in order.
Possibly; I'm not sure what the right thing to do is, considering the DHG's policy of mirroring the .cabal file dependencies. > At any rate, could you please take a look? A simple give-back should do the trick if libghc-persistent-dev 0.6.2 is available on the architecture. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
