Hi Charles,
On 26/09/11 00:18, Charles Kerr wrote:
>> Would you also accept a patch to the build system, so that it doesn't check
>> for the existence of the libutp.a file to decide whether to link against it
>> (instead looking for something generated during the configure phase, like a
>> Makefile)?
>
> Probably so, if the patch was straightforward.
The attached patch is as straightforward as it gets! :)
I just built 2.33 with it and found no issues (libutp gets built and
tr-qt links against it). I'd appreciate if someone could build it on a
non-Debian system, just to make sure there are no side-effects.
Should I forward this to the trac?
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
Index: repo/qt/qtr.pro
===================================================================
--- repo.orig/qt/qtr.pro 2011-07-04 16:48:11.454477073 +0200
+++ repo/qt/qtr.pro 2011-09-26 10:25:24.063146592 +0200
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
INCLUDEPATH = $${EVENT_TOP}/include $${INCLUDEPATH}
INCLUDEPATH += $${TRANSMISSION_TOP}
LIBS += $${TRANSMISSION_TOP}/libtransmission/libtransmission.a
-exists( $${TRANSMISSION_TOP}/third-party/libutp/libutp.a ) {
+exists( $${TRANSMISSION_TOP}/third-party/libutp/Makefile ) {
LIBS += $${TRANSMISSION_TOP}/third-party/libutp/libutp.a
}
LIBS += $${TRANSMISSION_TOP}/third-party/dht/libdht.a
