reassign 650524 pdnsd 1.2.7-par-1.2 found 650524 1.2.8-par-2 severity 650524 serious user initscripts-ng-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org usertags 650524 incorrect-dependency thanks
Thanks for your quick and insightful answer! On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 07:02:41PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > Actually, the cause is that the pdns package fail to list its virtual > facilities in /etc/insserv.conf.d/. The central register in > /etc/insserv.conf is not scalable, and thus the responsibility to > update the virtual facilities have been moved to the individual > package maintainers. See > <URL: http://wiki.debian.org/LSBInitScripts/DebianVirtualFacilities > for > some information on this mechanism. I totally agree. As of this writing a total of 14 packages actually use /etc/insserv.conf.d. What a shame. Interestingly unbound is one of them, so you can remove unbound from $named, right? So what about the others? * bind9: not using insserv.conf.d, no bug report * dnsmasq: not using insserv.conf.d, no bug report * lwresd: not using insserv.conf.d, no bug report Do you want me to file wishlist bugs for those packages? > The bug report for powerdns is <URL: http://bugs.debian.org/585966 > > and it should be fixed in testing and unstable. Thanks for pointing out. > If this fix is insufficient, I suggest reassigning this bug to pdns > and follow up on the problem there. If the fix is already in place, I > suggest we just close it as fixed. Sure. I reassigned the bug report. I also verified that unstable (1.2.8-par-2) is still affected. For the pdnsd maintainer: pdnsd should ship a file /etc/insserv.conf.d/pdnsd containing the line "$named pdnsd". (Thanks to Petter Reinholdtsen for explaining this to me.) Helmut -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
