Your message dated Sat, 8 Oct 2005 20:05:41 +0930
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#332732: mingw32-binutils - fails to build
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2005 08:38:06 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 08 01:38:06 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mobilewave.waldi.eu.org [82.139.201.22]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EOADW-0006BO-00; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 01:38:06 -0700
Received: by mobilewave.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 5920F1834F; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 10:37:48 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 10:37:48 +0200
From: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mingw32-binutils - fails to build
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: mingw32-binutils
Version: 2.16.91-20050827.1-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of mingw32-binutils_2.16.91-20050827.1-1 on debian-31 by
> sbuild/s390 69
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0), gettext, bison, flex, perl
[...]
> WARNING: `makeinfo' is missing on your system. You should only need it if
> you modified a `.texi' or `.texinfo' file, or any other file
> indirectly affecting the aspect of the manual. The spurious
> call might also be the consequence of using a buggy `make' (AIX,
> DU, IRIX). You might want to install the `Texinfo' package or
> the `GNU make' package. Grab either from any GNU archive site.
> make[3]: ***
> [/build/buildd/mingw32-binutils-2.16.91-20050827.1/build_dir/src/binutils-2.16.91-20050827-1/bfd/doc/bfd.info]
> Error 1
Bastian
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 332732-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2005 10:39:03 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 08 03:39:03 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ppp237-84.lns2.adl2.internode.on.net (hank.shelbyville.oz)
[203.122.237.84]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EOC6Y-0004t1-00; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 03:39:03 -0700
Received: from ron by hank.shelbyville.oz with local (Exim 4.54)
id 1EOC3J-000273-6q
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 20:05:41 +0930
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 20:05:41 +0930
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#332732: mingw32-binutils - fails to build
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
From: Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
-2 seems to have done the trick for this one, waiting to see
if the same is true for the other package now.
Ron
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 06:54:16PM +0930, Ron wrote:
>
> Already noted, working on fixing the build-deps now.
>
> thanks!
> Ron
>
> On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 10:37:48AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > Package: mingw32-binutils
> > Version: 2.16.91-20050827.1-1
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> >
> > > Automatic build of mingw32-binutils_2.16.91-20050827.1-1 on debian-31 by
> > > sbuild/s390 69
> > [...]
> > > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> > > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0), gettext, bison, flex, perl
> > [...]
> > > WARNING: `makeinfo' is missing on your system. You should only need it if
> > > you modified a `.texi' or `.texinfo' file, or any other file
> > > indirectly affecting the aspect of the manual. The spurious
> > > call might also be the consequence of using a buggy `make' (AIX,
> > > DU, IRIX). You might want to install the `Texinfo' package or
> > > the `GNU make' package. Grab either from any GNU archive site.
> > > make[3]: ***
> > > [/build/buildd/mingw32-binutils-2.16.91-20050827.1/build_dir/src/binutils-2.16.91-20050827-1/bfd/doc/bfd.info]
> > > Error 1
> >
> > Bastian
> >
> >
>
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
