Or something in the build environment?
* I've looked throught logs a bit and saw a different gcc/g++ version
on hurd-i386.
* More promising: in my i386 sid cowbuilder chroot, the build
succeeds with binutils-gold installed and fails without it.
heh it's usually the other way round ;) I guess I must have had
binutils-gold
installed when I was prepping the patch.
The problem seems to be wrong ordering of arguments on the linker
command line.
It seems that with the link options this package uses and with regular
ld that if a static
library needs symbols provided by another libary* then the libary that
needs the
symbols must be before the libary providing them on the linker command line.
A patch reordering the linking is attatched, please add it to the quilt
series. I can
confirm that with this patch the package builds with both regular
binutils and
binutils.gold.
*Unfortunately static libraries unlike dynamic libraries do not have an
internal dependency
list :(
Index: libdecodeqr-0.9.3/src/sample/simple/Makefile.in
===================================================================
--- libdecodeqr-0.9.3.orig/src/sample/simple/Makefile.in 2012-01-08 00:09:37.000000000 +0000
+++ libdecodeqr-0.9.3/src/sample/simple/Makefile.in 2012-01-08 00:09:37.000000000 +0000
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
LIBCV=@LIBCV@
LIBHIGHGUI=@LIBHIGHGUI@
-LIBS=$(LIBHIGHGUI) -lcxcore -ldecodeqr $(LIBCV)
+LIBS=-ldecodeqr $(LIBHIGHGUI) -lcxcore $(LIBCV)
LDFLAGS=@LDFLAGS@ -L$(LIBDECODEQR_DIR)
Index: libdecodeqr-0.9.3/src/sample/webcam/Makefile.in
===================================================================
--- libdecodeqr-0.9.3.orig/src/sample/webcam/Makefile.in 2012-01-08 00:09:37.000000000 +0000
+++ libdecodeqr-0.9.3/src/sample/webcam/Makefile.in 2012-01-08 00:11:41.000000000 +0000
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
LIBCV=@LIBCV@
LIBHIGHGUI=@LIBHIGHGUI@
-LIBS=$(LIBHIGHGUI) -lcxcore -ldecodeqr $(LIBCV)
+LIBS=-ldecodeqr $(LIBHIGHGUI) -lcxcore $(LIBCV)
LDFLAGS=@LDFLAGS@ -L$(LIBDECODEQR_DIR)
