Please take it under advisement that I am currently trying to persuade Thomas that the gdk-imlib11-dev and gdk-imlib11 packages should be abandoned in favor of reintroduction of gdk-imlib1 and gdk-imlib1-dev as libpng12-based packages. I know a couple of you have already uploaded your packages to fix these bugs, which if all goes according to plan means you will have to *re*upload shortly to revert this change, sorry. For the rest of you, I would suggest that you hold off on implementing this change until Thomas and I come to some sort of agreement.
One way or another, I do intend to reintroduce gdk-imlib1 and gdk-imlib1-dev to etch based on libpng12-0, so unless your package depends on libpng10-0 directly, you shouldn't need to reupload your package for the png transition. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
