Your message dated Mon, 10 Oct 2005 14:41:54 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#333048: Bug#333017: amaya: FTBFS (Build-Depends on
imlib1-dev or gdk-imlib1-dev)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Oct 2005 01:00:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 09 18:00:05 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EOm1N-0004p1-00; Sun, 09 Oct 2005 18:00:05 -0700
Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1EOm1N-0005HU-GQ
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 09 Oct 2005 18:00:05 -0700
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ygraph: FTBFS (Build-Depends on imlib1-dev or gdk-imlib1-dev)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute
permission for an emailed response.
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92
X-Zippy-Says: Imagine--a WORLD without POODLES...
Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 18:00:05 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: ygraph
Version: 0.15-1
Severity: serious
This package fails to build from source because it declares a build
dependency on imlib1-dev and/or gdk-imlib1-dev, which are no longer
installable due to the removal of libpng10-dev from Debian.
The imlib1-dev and gdk-imlib1-dev packages themselves will shortly be
dropped from Debian.
In most cases, you can fix the problem by changing the build dependency:
imlib1-dev -> imlib11-dev
gdk-imlib1-dev -> gdk-imlib11-dev
If your package declares a build dependency on gdk-imlib-dev as an
alternate for gdk-imlib1-dev, that is sufficient for correct
compilation, however, binary packages built in the past may depend on
gdk-imlib1, which is still a problem. If this is the case for your
packages, you should recompile to guarantee use of the new library so
that gdk-imlib1 can be removed in due course.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if there are any problems or difficulties.
Thomas
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 333048-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Oct 2005 12:42:04 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 10 05:42:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from antares.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.170.62]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EOwyh-0008S9-00; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 05:42:04 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by antares.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id
BA89D4A715;
Mon, 10 Oct 2005 14:41:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from antares.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (antares [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with LMTP id 31110-08; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 14:41:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by antares.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id BBF214A845; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 14:41:54 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 14:41:54 +0200
From: Daniel Kobras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#333048: Bug#333017: amaya: FTBFS (Build-Depends on imlib1-dev
or gdk-imlib1-dev)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at
tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 01:31:33AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Please take it under advisement that I am currently trying to persuade
> Thomas that the gdk-imlib11-dev and gdk-imlib11 packages should be abandoned
> in favor of reintroduction of gdk-imlib1 and gdk-imlib1-dev as
> libpng12-based packages. I know a couple of you have already uploaded your
> packages to fix these bugs, which if all goes according to plan means you
> will have to *re*upload shortly to revert this change, sorry. For the rest
> of you, I would suggest that you hold off on implementing this change until
> Thomas and I come to some sort of agreement.
Understood. I had already uploaded a new ygraph with changed build-deps
before this bug was filed, so at the moment ygraph is neither
uninstallable, nor does it FTBFS. Therefore I'm closing the report.
Please reopen or file a new bug if you reach a conclusion that requires
another upload.
Regards,
Daniel.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
