Your message dated Thu, 13 Oct 2005 20:44:53 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing for the sake of version tracking
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jul 2002 10:28:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 15 05:28:35 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from matav-1.matav.hu (Woody.fw.matav.hu) [145.236.241.98]
(firewall-user)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17U35l-0007dK-00; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 05:28:33 -0500
Received: by matav-1.matav.hu with smtp; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 12:28:30 +0200
Received: by kusturica.tii.matav.hu (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 15 Jul
2002 12:28:50 +0200
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 12:28:50 +0200
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libpam-ldap: no filter option in auth
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bcc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: libpam-ldap
Version: 140-1
Severity: normal
The following patch cures this.
I believe that it should be documented that the filters given
in the command line override the extrafilters in pam_ldap.conf
diff -ru orig/libpam-ldap-140/pam_ldap.c libpam-ldap-140/pam_ldap.c
--- orig/libpam-ldap-140/pam_ldap.c Mon Jul 15 12:24:09 2002
+++ libpam-ldap-140/pam_ldap.c Mon Jul 15 12:17:20 2002
@@ -2644,6 +2644,8 @@
try_first_pass = 1;
else if (!strncmp (argv[i], "config=", 7))
configFile = argv[i] + 7;
+ else if (!strncmp (argv[i], "filter=", 7))
+ extraFilter = argv[i] + 7;
else if (!strcmp (argv[i], "ignore_unknown_user"))
ignore_unknown_user = 1;
else if (!strcmp (argv[i], "no_warn"))
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux kusturica 2.4.17-lsm-6 #1 jue feb 21 00:15:01 CET 2002
i686 unknown
Versions of the packages libpam-ldap depends on:
ii debconf 1.0.22 Debian configuration management system
ii libc6 2.2.4-5 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii libldap2 2.0.23-3 OpenLDAP libraries.
ii libpam0g 0.72-33 Pluggable Authentication Modules library
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 145557-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Oct 2005 18:44:56 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 13 11:44:56 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from higgs.djpig.de [213.133.98.126]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EQ84W-0003RA-00; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 11:44:56 -0700
Received: from djpig by higgs.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EQ84T-0004H9-Ha
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 20:44:53 +0200
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 20:44:53 +0200
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Closing for the sake of version tracking
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Version: 144-1
Lets close this woody-only bug (which can't be fixed anyway) with
the version it was fixed in to not confuse version tracking.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
