On 30.05.2012 07:20, Matthias Klose wrote: > marked as pending on Thu, 17 May 2012, now uploading just the fix for the > build > failure.
wtf? I suggest you to read the developer's reference again to learn about proper NMUs instead of uploading random packages. For the record: *) There is a new upstream release coming day to day including a fix for gcc 4.7. That's why I tagged the bug pending and what I am waiting for. Pending does not mean "ohai, please NMU my package" *) There is *no* reason to upload a NMU straight to unstable. Especially not if the maintainer is responsive. *) It's not YOUR business to decide when I am going to fix your bug. My package has no reverse dependencies and is not blocking anything. It's perfectly working in Testing and Unstable. There is *no* need to be that impatient. -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
