Am Montag, den 18.06.2012, 00:38 +0200 schrieb Julien Cristau: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 00:23:38 +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote: > > > Am Sonntag, den 17.06.2012, 21:11 +0200 schrieb Rémi Vanicat: > > > The attached patch solve the FTBS. > > > > Can you please read [1] and check if we follow their rules? We need to > > rename the ruby package. Can make this package support all supported > > ruby versions? > > > A rename means NEW, which means it's not appropriate to fix this RC bug. > You can rename afterwards if you like.
Why is going through NEW inappropriate? -- Benjamin Drung Debian & Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
