On 22/06/12 15:04, intrigeri wrote: > Dererk wrote (22 Jun 2012 17:01:05 GMT) : >> Since this very very simple "typo" throws the Vidalia enduser >> a totally harmless but error-message-at-the-end[2], I thought I was >> better to avoid the user get confused about any possible issue on >> Vidalia, in contrast to depending on an extra single package, of >> course, up to dh-apparmor fixes this issue. > I agree this spurious error message issue should be fixed in > dh-apparmor, but nevertheless, I don't think that hiding a harmless > error message is worth a policy violation. > > (Moreover, IIRC when the apparmor package is installed, but AppArmor > is not enabled on the kernel command-line, some harmless error > messages are printed at boot time, so I think you're actually trading > "a harmless error message at upgrade time" for "another harmless error > message at every boot time + a policy violation", which is not > very convincing.) > > Cheers,
Hi intrigeri! You're right, I had a "mixed environment" running (I had configuration present but not the software installed because I removed on purpose), so I got no errors by the time I installed it. The truth is that its maintainer has commented me on private that he thinks he will be able to upload a fix very soon (possible tomorrow), which implies I can go ahead and remove the strong dependency there altogether with enhancing pkg documentation. Hopefuly both things will be meeting on time. Thanks! Cheers, :d: -- BOFH excuse #44: bank holiday - system operating credits not recharged
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
