Frankly, I can't understand what the patch did. On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 5:08 AM, Michael Gilbert <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 3:55 AM, Aron Xu wrote: >> >> On Jul 1, 2012 5:24 AM, "Michael Gilbert" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > I'm still investigating the problem and more details about it are >>> > welcomed, please don't NMU for either unstable or stable. >>> >>> Why? This kind of statement requires some kind of justification (such >>> as the proposed commit is incomplete or wrong or something like that). >>> Otherwise, why slow down others trying to help? >>> >>> Best wishes, >>> Mike >>> >> >> Actually I am not very willing to apply random patch without upstream >> acknowledgement or a clear statement of what problem it tries to fix. For >> this very issue, the solution is not clear to me about what problem it's >> trying to mitigate, and at the same time looks ugly on hard coding a magic >> size of 1024*1024*512 without a proper description. So I ask people don't >> NMU and give me more time to investigate. > > As the new maintainer, you should probably request access to the > chromium security mailing list since they tend to find a lot of the > security issues disclosed for libxml2. > > Best wishes, > Mike > > > > _______________________________________________ > debian-xml-sgml-pkgs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-xml-sgml-pkgs
-- YunQiang Su -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
