On 08/02/2012 10:44 AM, Peter Samuelson wrote: > I do wonder if it is somehow related to Bug #665476. I mean, probably > not, but possibly? Peter Could be indeed. I rebuilt subversion without SASL after realizing SASL is an optional dependency, and svn is working fine. I suppose a way to isolate it to the ABI issue would be rebuilding the SASL libs, and building svn against that? I don't entirely understand the implications of Bug #665476.
Steve -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
