On 22.09.2012 15:04, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2012-09-22 12:08, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> I don't want this in gcc-4.7. Please provide a patch for gcc-defaults. This
>> should work as well.
> 
> That won't work, just tried it. The only package from gcc-defaults that
> could be involved in the problematic upgrade paths is gcj-jre-headless

wrong. You even include another one below:

> libgcj-bc 4.7.1-1

and libgcj-common.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to