Hi, all.
I am uim-mozc maintainer.
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 6:13 PM, <d...@debian.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:44:49AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> >> You probably should add to uim-data
>> >> Breaks: uim-MODULE (<< FIXEDVERSION~)
>> >> for all module packages that used the path /etc/uim
>> >
>> > Added Breaks: only uim's own module packages,
>> > except not owned packages: uim-mozc and uim-chewing.
>>
>> Why not the others? They need to be taken care for as well as (I assume)
>> they won't be working correctly unless they register in the new
>> location. And they may be the cause for cruft being created and left
>> over in /etc/uim even after the primary uim packages were updated.
>
> I wait answer from them to follow updating uim for a short while.
> I will add Breaks: uim-mozc (<< uim-mozc's FIXEDVERSION~),
> uim-chewing (<< uim-chewing's FIXEDVERSION~).
>
> If I do not receive from them, I will add Breaks: to specify
> current package version: Breaks: uim-mozc (<= 1.5.1090.102-3),
> uim-chewing (<= 0.1.0-2).
I am working this and I will fix this for uim-mozc in 1.5.1090.102-4.
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
--
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
GPG ID: 40AD1FA6
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
