Your message dated Thu, 3 Nov 2005 16:43:00 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line No it is not
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Aug 2005 12:15:17 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 29 05:15:17 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from adsl-78-168-20.hsv.bellsouth.net (hades.marenka.net)
[216.78.168.20]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E9iXl-00074D-00; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 05:15:17 -0700
Received: from hades2.marenka.net (hades2.marenka.net [10.0.0.2])
by hades.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A2611778E
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 07:15:15 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from localhost (hades2.marenka.net [127.0.0.1])
by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B8F935B18
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 07:15:16 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from hades2.marenka.net ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (hades2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 12209-10 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Mon, 29 Aug 2005 07:15:10 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 105)
id 79F5E3583A; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 07:15:10 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by loki.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 39AFE130283; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 07:13:08 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 07:13:08 -0500
From: Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ufraw_0.4+cvs20050818-1(m68k/unstable/zeus): FTBFS on m68k
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at marenka.net
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: ufraw
Version: 0.4+cvs20050818-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch.
Tags: sid
ufraw fails to build from source on m68k. This is likely due
to bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaround, you might try compiling with
less optimization or gcc-3.3/gcc-3.4.
A full buildd log is available at
<http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=ufraw&ver=0.4+cvs20050818-1&arch=m68k>
Other buildd logs may be available at
<http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=ufraw>
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 325556-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Nov 2005 15:43:24 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 03 07:43:24 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from run.smurf.noris.de (server.smurf.noris.de) [192.109.102.41]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EXhFM-0004ur-00; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 07:43:24 -0800
Received: from smurf by server.smurf.noris.de with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EXhEy-00054K-Sl
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 16:43:00 +0100
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 16:43:00 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: No it is not
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_REAL_NAME
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
The fact that the package doesn't build on m68k due to a bug in GCC
isn't a serious problem with the *package*. Filing an FTBFS bug on it
doesn't accomplish anything.
Anyway, it builds now, so I'm closing this.
--ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDajAE8+hUANcKr/kRAv1RAJ96y8U1vtyL7SsvSOZUsE3G1980JACfdFRF
kH0D93DJcdSHYdlOX9rmWCQ=
=3HpP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
