Your message dated Thu, 3 Nov 2005 16:52:21 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closed in upload
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Oct 2005 04:25:40 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 06 21:25:40 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1ENjng-0002Pt-00; Thu, 06 Oct 2005 21:25:40 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain 
(pool-71-104-166-233.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.166.233])
        (authenticated bits=0)
        by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j974PaLH048874
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 21:25:39 -0700 (PDT)
        (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
        id 1ENXuX-0000wl-9s
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 06 Oct 2005 08:43:57 -0700
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 08:43:57 -0700
From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FTBFS: Missing build-dependency on texinfo
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RASg3xLB4tUQ4RcS"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1119/Thu Oct  6 11:29:53 2005 on zoot.lafn.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_12_24 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--RASg3xLB4tUQ4RcS
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5"
Content-Disposition: inline


--bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: libtasn1-2
Version: 0.2.13-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

libtasn1-2 fails to build because it uses texi2dvi but does not
build-depend on texinfo:

> TEXINPUTS=3D".:$TEXINPUTS" \
> MAKEINFO=3D'/bin/sh /tmp/buildd/libtasn1-2-0.2.13/missing --run makeinfo =
  -I .' \
> texi2dvi libtasn1.texi
> /bin/sh: texi2dvi: command not found

--=20
Matt

--bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=patch
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

diff -u libtasn1-2-0.2.13/debian/control libtasn1-2-0.2.13/debian/control
--- libtasn1-2-0.2.13/debian/control
+++ libtasn1-2-0.2.13/debian/control
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 Source: libtasn1-2
 Section: libs
 Maintainer: Matthias Urlichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.1), cdbs, bison, tetex-bin, tetex-extra, bi=
nutils (>=3D 2.14.90.0.7), gtk-doc-tools
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.1), cdbs, bison, tetex-bin, tetex-extra, bi=
nutils (>=3D 2.14.90.0.7), gtk-doc-tools, texinfo
 Standards-Version: 3.6.1
=20
 Package: libtasn1-2-dev

--bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5--

--RASg3xLB4tUQ4RcS
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDRUY8fNdgYxVXvBARApxmAJ0TEv+pp8N8rO94i+BxeORtojvlHACeNWeJ
LCfxwJKImalOM6i5882yKK8=
=P0gK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--RASg3xLB4tUQ4RcS--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 332563-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Nov 2005 15:52:24 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 03 07:52:24 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from run.smurf.noris.de (server.smurf.noris.de) [192.109.102.41] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EXhO4-0007fY-00; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 07:52:24 -0800
Received: from smurf by server.smurf.noris.de with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EXhO1-0005Rd-6t
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 16:52:21 +0100
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 16:52:21 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Closed in upload
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+SfteS7bOf3dGlBC"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_REAL_NAME 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--+SfteS7bOf3dGlBC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Closed by uploading libtasn1-2 (0.2.17-1).


--+SfteS7bOf3dGlBC
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDajI18+hUANcKr/kRAvOMAJ0a0cR8WhrVY+Ie9WexSSxdhPVQkACgmTTE
Q6bFesUc+M0xFCrfXAbOUbk=
=pFuw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--+SfteS7bOf3dGlBC--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to