Your message dated Sat, 05 Nov 2005 06:02:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#337594: fixed in sbcl 1:0.9.6.0-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2005 06:05:01 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 04 22:05:01 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.59] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EYHAj-0006Kx-00; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 22:05:01 -0800 Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff.nat.blars.org [172.16.2.7]) by renig.nat.blars.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jA564txU025246 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 4 Nov 2005 22:04:59 -0800 Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff [127.0.0.1]) by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jA55tLKd015718; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 21:55:22 -0800 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id jA55tLNp015716; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 21:55:21 -0800 Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 21:55:21 -0800 From: Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: sbcl: ftbfs [sparc] build dependacies can not be satisfied Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: sbcl Version: 1:0.9.6.0-7 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source sbcl build-depends on sbcl-common (<= 1:0.9.5.50-1), and version 1:0.9.6.0-7 is in sid. Checking correctness of source dependencies... After installing, the following source dependencies are still unsatisfied: sbcl-common(inst 1:0.9.6.0-7 ! <= wanted 1:0.9.5.50-1) sbcl-common(inst 1:0.9.6.0-7 >> conflicted 1:0.9.5.50-1) Source-dependencies not satisfied; skipping sbcl --------------------------------------- Received: (at 337594-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2005 14:06:26 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 05 06:06:26 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EYOcQ-0006WL-00; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 06:02:06 -0800 From: Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#337594: fixed in sbcl 1:0.9.6.0-8 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 06:02:06 -0800 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: sbcl Source-Version: 1:0.9.6.0-8 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of sbcl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: sbcl-common_0.9.6.0-8_all.deb to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl-common_0.9.6.0-8_all.deb sbcl_0.9.6.0-8.diff.gz to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl_0.9.6.0-8.diff.gz sbcl_0.9.6.0-8.dsc to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl_0.9.6.0-8.dsc sbcl_0.9.6.0-8_i386.deb to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl_0.9.6.0-8_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated sbcl package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 11:25:52 +0100 Source: sbcl Binary: sbcl sbcl-common Architecture: source i386 all Version: 1:0.9.6.0-8 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: sbcl - A development environment for Common Lisp sbcl-common - Architecture independent files for SBCL Closes: 337365 337594 Changes: sbcl (1:0.9.6.0-8) unstable; urgency=low . * Added patches to allow cross-building from clisp. This seems to work on my machine at least. It also fixes the FTBFS on sparc. (Closes: #337594) * So dropped the Build-Dependency on sbcl, and we use clisp * corrected the problem in pre-rm script that prevents removal (Closes: #337365) Files: bb8e10329bcb711053a2890baec9559f 658 devel optional sbcl_0.9.6.0-8.dsc b1ac8911e8d8c743f7c442d8dc267b95 20742 devel optional sbcl_0.9.6.0-8.diff.gz 5f8b3e159dcc017cc874f305c2e8a19c 3969174 devel optional sbcl-common_0.9.6.0-8_all.deb 95fd0c3cb14ca25fe13a44bb886f0b30 9140752 devel optional sbcl_0.9.6.0-8_i386.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDbLYC11ldN0tyliURAvOCAJ0TfWB2DRNTX2nLt/7ExtJTGDPfkQCfSZ1a KVwRraeQD5Hg/KmG/sy4MEw= =qLjj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]