On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 15:37:41 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Followup-For: Bug #694015 > > Hi, > > On Monday, 21. January 2013 10:34:37 Bdale Garbee wrote: > > so no, I don't really agree that it would be better to have no geda-gaf > > than to have 1.6 in wheezy. > > On Monday, 21. January 2013 11:22:27 Bdale Garbee wrote: > > أحمد المحمودي <[email protected]> writes: > > > Bdale, I've added gregoa's patch & pushed to git. Please upload. > > > > Done. debian/1.8.1-2 uploaded, tagged, and pushed. > > Well, wanting to keep (and fix) RC-buggy geda 1.6 in wheezy and > uploading a new upstream to unstable (currently stuck in NEW) contradict > each other. > > I have prepared a NMU 1:1.6.2-4.3 cherry-picking gregoa's patch. > Once that has passed my piuparts tests I'll upload it to DELAYED/2. > Patch attached. > > What can be done to block/cancel/reroute-to-experimental the 1.8.x > packages currently in NEW? This would allow getting this fix via sid > and avoiding the t-p-u road. > Well they're in NEW so they're pretty much already blocked. ftpmaster, could you make a note to not accept geda-gaf from NEW until after Andreas' NMU is in wheezy, at least?
Cheers, Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
