I also checked the initial Debian package on snapshot.debian.org (version 20050930-1). It also has only the non-free license in the individual files, but states "Dual GPLv2/ACPICA Licence" in d/copyright. It also has the BSD-3-clause-or-GPL-2 bit in d/copyright.
It's likely that it was already dual-licensed, but that this wasn't documented in the tarball itself. I'm not sure why they now have two tarballs instead of one with both licenses... The "GNU General Public License or via a separate license that may be more favorable to commercial OSVs" (from the FAQ) seems also wrong given there are *three* licenses: the non-free one, a 3-clause BSD and the GPL-2. Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
