Your message dated Sun, 5 May 2013 16:54:33 +0600
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#701040: sslsniff: segfaults on startup when used with
sid's libssl1.0.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #701040,
regarding sslsniff: segfaults on startup when used with sid's libssl1.0.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
701040: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=701040
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sslsniff
Version: 0.8-3+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Tags: sid
I tried to use sslsniff as documented in its man page to perform a
man-in-the-middle attack on applications in a virtual machine:
sslsniff -a -c /usr/share/sslsniff/certs/wildcard -s 4433 -w
~/tmp/sslsniff.log
with an appropriate REDIRECT rule to steal traffic from the virtual
machine. With libssl1.0.0 1.0.1c-4 from testing (on an otherwise sid system),
this works fine; with libssl1.0.0 1.0.1e-1 from sid, it segfaults on startup.
(I realise this might need to be reassigned to libssl1.0.0 if it turns
out to be a regression, but I'm reporting the bug against sslsniff to start
with, in case it's doing something unsupported.)
Regards,
S
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 07:48:56PM +0000, Simon McVittie wrote:
> I tried to use sslsniff as documented in its man page to perform a
> man-in-the-middle attack on applications in a virtual machine:
>
> sslsniff -a -c /usr/share/sslsniff/certs/wildcard -s 4433 -w
> ~/tmp/sslsniff.log
>
> with an appropriate REDIRECT rule to steal traffic from the virtual
> machine. With libssl1.0.0 1.0.1c-4 from testing (on an otherwise sid system),
> this works fine; with libssl1.0.0 1.0.1e-1 from sid, it segfaults on startup.
>
> (I realise this might need to be reassigned to libssl1.0.0 if it turns
> out to be a regression, but I'm reporting the bug against sslsniff to start
> with, in case it's doing something unsupported.)
It fails with 1.0.1e-1 but works with 1.0.1e-2 so it must be #703031.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
