Doko,
On 17 November 2005 at 03:22, Matthias Klose wrote:
| Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the
| archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can
| upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures
| because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW
| queue until the required toolchain changes are installed on the buildd's.
I am getting this because of Quantlib. Now, for libquantlib-0.3.11, the most
recent version, as well as for the preceding ones:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> apt-cache rdepends libquantlib-0.3.11
libquantlib-0.3.11
Reverse Depends:
r-cran-rquantlib
quantlib-ruby
quantlib-python
quantlib-examples
quantlib-examples
libquantlib0-dev
libquantlib0-dev
Do I really need to do the "c2a" renaming dance? I upload a new Quantlib,
and a day later rebuild my two packages that depend on ? [ quantlib-swig
provides quantlib-ruby and quantlib-python; rquantlib provides
r-cran-rquantlib; quantlib-examples comes fromq quantlib itself. ]
This small set makes Quantlib a little easier to deal with than a full blown
KDE component or base library. So shall we do this without "c2a" ?
Dirk
--
Statistics: The (futile) attempt to offer certainty about uncertainty.
-- Roger Koenker, 'Dictionary of Received Ideas of Statistics'
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
