On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 12:26:04 +0100, Simon McVittie <s...@debian.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 at 00:20:37 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 19:01:40 +0200, Stephen Kitt <sk...@debian.org> wrote:
> > > Matthias, to help upgrades this will still need a Breaks statement in
> > > binutils - presumably binutils-mingw-w64 (<< 2.23.52.20130612-1+3).
> > 
> > Of course that's binutils-mingw-w64-i686 (<< 2.23.52.20130612-1+3),
> > binutils-mingw-w64-x86-64 (<< 2.23.52.20130612-1+3).
> 
> I think it needs both Breaks and Replaces to deal with file conflicts
> gracefully?

Yes indeed, thanks for pointing that out!

Regards,

Stephen

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to