On Saturday 19 November 2005 10:41, Steve Langasek wrote: > Do we actually have reason to believe that this is a memory leak, i.e., > leaving the daemon running will continue to eat more memory? If the > program simply needs 70-some MB to run, that's unfortunate, but not RC; > if, OTOH, its memory usage continues to grow beyond the point shown in > the bug report, I agree that sounds release-critical.
Yes, it slowly continues to eat more and more memory over time. The situation shown in the bug report came to be after running for several months. It runs fine using less memory when restarted.
pgpdx3q2RZNgv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
