Your message dated Mon, 1 Jul 2013 21:24:08 +0200
with message-id <20130701192408.ga14...@rene-engelhard.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#713115: liborcus: FTBFS: build-dependency not
installable: libmdds-dev
has caused the Debian Bug report #713115,
regarding liborcus: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libmdds-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
713115: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=713115
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: liborcus
Version: 0.3.0-7
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
> │ Install liborcus build dependencies (apt-based resolver)
> │
> └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
>
> Installing build dependencies
> Reading package lists...
> Building dependency tree...
> Reading state information...
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> sbuild-build-depends-liborcus-dummy : Depends: libmdds-dev but it is not
> going to be installed
> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
> apt-get failed.
The full build log is available from:
http://aws-logs.debian.net/ftbfs-logs/2013/06/20/liborcus_0.3.0-7_unstable.log
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
[ sorry, just saw the bug today... ]
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 01:37:23PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > sbuild-build-depends-liborcus-dummy : Depends: libmdds-dev but it is not
> > going to be installed
> > E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
> > apt-get failed.
>
> The full build log is available from:
>
> http://aws-logs.debian.net/ftbfs-logs/2013/06/20/liborcus_0.3.0-7_unstable.log
Which is totally saying nothing except the above (surprise, NOT!)
I suspect a temporary sid breakage there, libmdds-dev is (and was then) there:
libmdds-dev | 0.7.1-3 | jessie | all
libmdds-dev | 0.7.1-3 | sid | all
Especially as LO uploaded later (2013-06-24) found it fine:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=libreoffice&ver=1%3A4.1.0~rc1-1&suite=experimental
Please, a bit more care...
Regards,
Rene
--- End Message ---
