Hi!
On k, 2013-08-20 at 12:18 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Szalay Attila wrote:
> >
> > dh $@ --with autoreconf --fail-missing
> >
> > then dh will call all the helper scripts with -O--fail-missing. And
> > dh_install does not like this. if I override the dh_install target and
> > call the dh_install from it in it's normal way, then it works like a
> > charm.
Maybe I wa not clear enough. In my package I worked around this problem
with the following code:
override_dh_install:
dh_install --fail-missing
> I don't see any similarity between that and bug #718121. You are asking
> dh to pass --fail-missing on to dh_install, and the option is,
> presumably, behaving as it's supposed to.
Ok. I try to be more clear.
dh_install -O--fail-missing do nothing. Not even saying that it will do
nothing.
In other way, dh_install --fail-missing copy files. Which is not a big
suprise, because that is the job of the program.
> Please avoid sending unrelated stuff to RC bug reports in the future.
> Such bug reports are typically read by a lot of people, and adding such
> noise makes them harder to follow.
I do not thing that I sent unrelated thing. my problem is looking very
similar. dh_install wasn't copy ANY files, when it's called trough the
dh. Isn't this bug is about this?
I know what --fail-missing is do. And I use it in the way it should be
used. And I'm able to differentiate the error message about files left
in the tmp area and when dh_install say it could find nothing.
But - which is an other interesting thing - I could not reproduce the
problem in my building machine. So I could not produce evidence. :(
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
