intrigeri (intrig...@debian.org) wrote: > > If nothing has happened on this front, I'm afraid the OTR support in > BitlBee should now be considered as not maintained. > There's a fix actually, I've just not managed to take a closer look at it, plus ther was some comment that it might not be complete yet. I've asked for clarification since I might have misundestood this part:
http://bugs.bitlbee.org/bitlbee/ticket/1004#comment:9 > This has been keeping noteworthy security improvements for all other > consumers of libotr out of Jessie for too long now, so I recommend > that bitlbee is built without OTR support in Debian -- this certainly > can be reverted when it gets updated and maintained again :) > Argh! I had no idea this was blocking other packages, sorry. :-( Well it'd be easy to just omit the bitlbee-plugin-otr package from Debian for now while this is getting resolved. Although omitting a single binary package is probably easier said than done. I have very little time for this stuff at the moment, sadly. :-( Wilmer v/d Gaast. -- +-------- .''`. - -- ---+ + - -- --- ---- ----- ------+ | wilmer : :' : gaast.net | | OSS Programmer www.bitlbee.org | | lintux `. `~' debian.org | | Full-time geek wilmer.gaast.net | +--- -- - ` ---------------+ +------ ----- ---- --- -- - +
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
