Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 12:08:26PM +0100, Florian Ernst wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 12:28:50AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Is there any reason to not simply drop libmusicbrainz-2.0, in favor of the
libmusicbrainz-2.1 package that *everything* else in the archive is using?
[...]
It's my opinion that libmusicbrainz-2.0 is unreleasable whether or not you
do this NMU, because it's an obsolete version of the lib that should be
removed. So I would definitely recommend that you focus on making python
bindings available for -2.1, rather than spending time NMUing -2.0.
I agree. I've CC'ed the Maintainers of the remaining reverse depends of
libmusicbrainz2, to get feedback. Hopefully the two packages (dcd,
libtunepimp) can be rebuilt against libmusicbrainz 2.1.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
