Your message dated Wed, 07 Dec 2005 17:29:12 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#332562: marked as done (TeTeX causes FTBFS on
debian-reference)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Oct 2005 04:25:29 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 06 21:25:29 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ENjnV-0002PP-00; Thu, 06 Oct 2005 21:25:29 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain
(pool-71-104-166-233.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.166.233])
(authenticated bits=0)
by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j974PQW5048871
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 21:25:28 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1ENYLY-0000yF-CR
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 06 Oct 2005 09:11:52 -0700
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 09:11:52 -0700
From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FTBFS: Link not found in target hashtable
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1119/Thu Oct 6 11:29:53 2005 on zoot.lafn.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: debian-reference
Version: 1.08-4
Severity: serious
debian-reference fails to build because it cannot find a link in the
target hashtable:
> debiandoc2latexps -l $(echo zh-cn | bin/getlocale) reference.zh-cn.sgml
> debiandoc2latexps: ERROR: reference.zh-cn.ps could not be generated prope=
rly
> debiandoc2latexps: rerun with the -v option to found out why
Here's the end of the output that is generated when I pass -v:
> dvips: Oh no, link not found in target hashtable
> dvips: Hfootnote.64
> dvips: !
--=20
Matt
--X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDRUzHfNdgYxVXvBARAkJIAJ9ljdkzxF+FvQEocnRlGCp5AyvdbwCeMCDg
lwF05UmRDVzbGc+mqPDVTgI=
=yWnA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 332562-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Dec 2005 16:28:44 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 07 08:28:43 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from idmailgate2.unizh.ch ([130.60.127.101])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ek29r-0004Rz-8j; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 08:28:43 -0800
Received: from localhost ([130.60.169.219])
by idmailgate2.unizh.ch (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id
jB7GSeI2006996;
Wed, 7 Dec 2005 17:28:41 +0100
Received: from localhost
([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost.localdomain ident=frank)
by localhost with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ek2AL-0000Vz-HL; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 17:29:13 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#332562: marked as done (TeTeX causes FTBFS on
debian-reference)
X-Attribution: fant
X-Ehrenamt: http://www.langau.de
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (
=?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster's_message_of?= "Wed, 07 Dec 2005 16:37:34
+0100")
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 17:29:12 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Frank K=FCster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> reopen 332562
> stop
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote:
>
>> Your message dated Wed, 07 Dec 2005 06:32:11 -0800
>> with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> and subject line Bug#335055: fixed in tetex-bin 3.0-11
>> has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
>
> I have no idea why katie closes a bug in debian-reference when I upload
> a new version of tetex-bin, especially given that the bug number 332562
> does not appear in the changes file:
>
>> Closes: 207874 335055 335477 336092 337308 338986 339388 341940 342292
>
> Does anybody have a clue?
Of course - it was merged, and I mixed it up with the other
debian-reference bug.
Regards, Frank
--=20
Frank K=FCster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Z=FCrich
Debian Developer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
