On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Steve McIntyre <[email protected]> wrote: > Control: tag -1 +confirmed > > On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 08:07:49PM +0200, David Suárez wrote: >>Source: aptdaemon >>Version: 1.1.1-1 >>Severity: serious >>Tags: jessie sid >>User: [email protected] >>Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131006 qa-ftbfs >>Justification: FTBFS on amd64 >> >>Hi, >> >>During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on >>amd64. >> >>Relevant part (hopefully): >>> ====================================================================== >>> ERROR: test (tests.test_pep8.AptDaemonPep8TestCase) >>> Check if the source code matches the PEP8 style conventions. >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Traceback (most recent call last): >>> File "/«PKGBUILDDIR»/tests/test_pep8.py", line 35, in test >>> "aptdaemon", "tests"]) >>> File "/usr/lib/python3.3/subprocess.py", line 547, in check_call >>> raise CalledProcessError(retcode, cmd) >>> subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['pep8', '--statistics', >>> '--show-source', '--show-pep8', '--exclude', 'pkenums.py', 'aptdaemon', >>> 'tests']' returned non-zero exit status 1 >>> >>> ====================================================================== >>> FAIL: test_install_file (tests.test_worker.WorkerTestCase) >>> Test the installation of a local package file. >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Traceback (most recent call last): >>> File "/«PKGBUILDDIR»/tests/test_worker.py", line 342, in test_install_file >>> trans.error.details) >>> nose.proxy.AssertionError: False is not true : Lintian check results for >>> /«PKGBUILDDIR»/tests/repo/silly-depend-base-lintian-broken_0.1-0_all.deb: >>> >>> 'False is not true : Lintian check results for >>> /«PKGBUILDDIR»/tests/repo/silly-depend-base-lintian-broken_0.1-0_all.deb:\n' >>> = self._formatMessage('False is not true : Lintian check results for >>> /«PKGBUILDDIR»/tests/repo/silly-depend-base-lintian-broken_0.1-0_all.deb:\n', >>> "%s is not true" % safe_repr(False)) >>> >> raise self.failureException('False is not true : Lintian check results >>> >> for >>> >> /«PKGBUILDDIR»/tests/repo/silly-depend-base-lintian-broken_0.1-0_all.deb:\n') >>> >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Ran 78 tests in 136.860s >>> >>> FAILED (failures=1, errors=1, skipped=4) >>> make[1]: *** [test-python3.3] Error 1 > > Ping? > > Over 5 months later with no response. I have just confirmed the > problem locally with a test build. Should we remove aptdaemon? >
The thing is, it runs fine. Some packages just have crazy test suites which start failing at some point. Simply disabling them (for example, by adding an || true to debian/rules) is better until everyone switched to PackageKit and we remove it or upstream manages to create a new release. -- Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
