* Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org> [140409 02:46]: > Christian Hofstaedtler <z...@debian.org> writes: > > > During a test rebuild your package failed to build. The test rebuild > > was done using sbuild, in unstable. > > > The build produced this output: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > util/network/client.....FAILED 21-22 > > util/network/server.....ok > > util/tokens.............FAILED 10 > > util/vector.............ok > > util/xmalloc............skipped (xmalloc tests only run for maintainer) > > util/xwrite.............ok > > Hm. Those are timing-sensitive tests that can fail on extremely slow > systems, but I did have them tweaked so that they pass on all of Debian's > buildds.
Actually this should be quite a fast system. > > I notice that this also uses an obsolete version of Ruby (1.9). Please > > update your package to use either the meta package (ruby) or ruby2.1. > > Yeah, I was getting ready to make that change. (There's no way for this > package to use the metapackage.) It currently builds against 1.9 and 2.0; > I'll change that to build against 2.0 and 2.1 and upload without any > changes to the tests and see if the buildds are still happy. If so, I > think the FTBFS is spurious. Note that there's also a ruby-all-dev metapackage. Maybe you can make use of it... > Thanks for the report! Thanks for your fast reply! -- ,''`. Christian Hofstaedtler <z...@debian.org> : :' : Debian Developer `. `' 7D1A CFFA D9E0 806C 9C4C D392 5C13 D6DB 9305 2E03 `-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
