Your message dated Thu, 15 Dec 2005 09:17:09 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#336047: fixed in epos 1:2.5.36-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Oct 2005 15:27:38 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 27 08:27:38 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.lenk.info [217.160.183.176] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EV9fG-0007uH-00; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 08:27:38 -0700
Received: from smtp.lenk.info ([82.165.24.235] ident=Debian-exim)
        by mail.lenk.info with esmtpsa 
        (Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50 1)
        id 1EV9gJ-0004iT-5m; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 17:28:43 +0200
Received: from p54a3f636.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.163.246.54] 
helo=feynman.djpig.de)
        by smtp.lenk.info with esmtpsa 
        (Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50 1)
        id 1EV9fR-0005DO-A7; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 17:27:49 +0200
Received: from djpig by feynman.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.54)
        id 1EV9fE-0001q4-LH; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 17:27:36 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Tries to use non-essential package on purge
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 17:27:36 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: epos
Version: 1:2.5.36-1
Severity: grave

>From your postrm:

if test "$1" = "purge"; then
  update-rc.d epos remove >/dev/null

  rm -rf /var/log/epos

  if id -u $USER_NAME >/dev/null 2>&1; then
    deluser --quiet --remove-home $USER_NAME
  fi
fi

deluser is from adduser, a non-essential package. So you can't use it on
purge, at least not unconditionally.

Gruesse,
        Frank Lichtenheld

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 336047-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Dec 2005 17:21:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 15 09:21:05 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1Emwj7-0005SF-LR; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 09:17:09 -0800
From: Christopher Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $
Subject: Bug#336047: fixed in epos 1:2.5.36-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 09:17:09 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: epos
Source-Version: 1:2.5.36-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
epos, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

epos_2.5.36-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/e/epos/epos_2.5.36-4.diff.gz
epos_2.5.36-4.dsc
  to pool/main/e/epos/epos_2.5.36-4.dsc
epos_2.5.36-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/epos/epos_2.5.36-4_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Christopher Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated epos package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 08:53:11 -0500
Source: epos
Binary: epos
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:2.5.36-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Christopher Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 epos       - Language independent text-to-speech system
Closes: 336047 341426
Changes: 
 epos (1:2.5.36-4) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Add a dependency on perl, ensuring that all modules required for
     "deluser --remove-home" are present. (Closes: #341426)
   * Fix the deluser check in postrm, which always found deluser whether it
     was actually present or not. (Closes: #336047)
Files: 
 7a07a9d767820fce13f7ab57df60bdf5 672 sound optional epos_2.5.36-4.dsc
 b5d0ef23923be96468a64d0db95e2fd0 24189 sound optional epos_2.5.36-4.diff.gz
 38c9f4149fcc1fc4479d68aac29b8c6f 639138 sound optional epos_2.5.36-4_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Signed by Christopher Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

iD8DBQFDoaECU+gWW+vtsysRAv80AJ9HOhrZub2JDzcSdgQn/4K7AnoLUwCfYxWR
fzJ3qq0/tvXWHx3ZG+xCC7k=
=4y4Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to