[Cc-ing #749974 since that's the relevant bug]
Thanks for your work on this, Paul.
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:40:15AM -0500, Paul Elliott wrote:
> BUT! I have just checked packages.debian.org and I find that
> libwxsqlite3-3.0-dev which the new version of maitreya will depend on
> is still in experimental!
Uploading libwxsqlite3 to unstable would start the transition, so we're
currently waiting for the reverse dependencies to be ready. Since
codelite has been ready for while, that means we're waiting for
guayadeque and ... you.
There's a partial patch from dmn for guayadeque, but no maintainer
response so far.
> Even if it were released to unstable
> immeadiately, it would take at least 10 days, by my understanding, for
> it to reach testing, and then 10 days for maitreya to follow.
As Niels says, the default urgency is now medium, which means 5 days,
and both packages could age concurrently rather than consecutively,
so it could actually just be 5 days if both were uploaded
simultaneously.
As he also says, the timer gets reset if you post a status update to
the ticket.
> I plan to grab the source for libwxsqlite3-3.0-dev from
> testing and see if I can get it to build under unstable.
^experimental?
You should just be able to build maitreya in an unstable chroot
set up to use experimental for packages which can't be provided by
unstable (due to a versioned BD or unstable not having the package).
Exactly how to set that up depends on what tool you're using to do the
building in a clean chroot.
Cheers,
Olly
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
