Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 02:24:15 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#343992: rapple: not installable in sid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2005 09:26:16 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 01:26:16 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bal.lis.inpg.fr ([195.220.21.15])
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EoHHb-00072Y-Rk
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 01:26:16 -0800
Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.17])
        by bal.lis.inpg.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B94E3067D2;
        Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:25:45 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 179832C811D;
        Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:25:45 +0100 (CET)
Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr ([127.0.0.1])
        by localhost (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
        with ESMTP id 26284-06; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:25:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: from irancy.lis.inpg.fr (irancy.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.167])
        by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with SMTP id BD38D2C80DA;
        Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:25:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: by irancy.lis.inpg.fr (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 19 Dec 2005 
10:25:27 +0100
From: "Laurent Bonnaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: rapple: not installable in sid
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:25:27 +0100
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at lis.inpg.fr
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: rapple
Version: 1.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


Hi,

rapple needs to be updated to depend on a newer libtidy version:

# apt-get install rapple
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.

Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  rapple: Depends: libtidy0 but it is not going to be installed
E: Broken packages


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (99, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 343992-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2005 10:24:16 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 02:24:16 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86] 
helo=tennyson.dodds.net)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EoIBk-00035P-8n
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 02:24:16 -0800
Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 6D4BC7002; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 02:24:15 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 02:24:15 -0800
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Laurent Bonnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#343992: rapple: not installable in sid
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ai3I8gwHc37+ASRI"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--ai3I8gwHc37+ASRI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 10:25:27AM +0100, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
> Package: rapple
> Version: 1.0-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable

> rapple needs to be updated to depend on a newer libtidy version:

> # apt-get install rapple
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree... Done
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.

> Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
> the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
> that package should be filed.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:

> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>   rapple: Depends: libtidy0 but it is not going to be installed
> E: Broken packages

Queued for binNMUs; no further maintainer action is required.

Laurent, for packages that only require rebuilding in order to fix
uninstallability bugs, it's simpler to just email debian-release requesting
rebuilds.

Thanks,
--=20
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                   http://www.debian.org/

--ai3I8gwHc37+ASRI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDpopPKN6ufymYLloRArHUAJwLkl8qcs/q6Bj8xy5LJxBLxnsougCgrLPx
xE8xX81CHsXj6QR780QamCA=
=291s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ai3I8gwHc37+ASRI--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to