done! http://www.antlr2.org/license.html
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 4:32 AM, Thorsten Glaser <t...@mirbsd.de> wrote: > Terence Parr dixit: > > >http://www.antlr2.org/license.html > > OK, now we got the (as far as I see) final piece, too. > > I suggest to add another paragraph, possibly this: > > <p>The Python parser generator code under antlr/actions/python/ is > covered by the 3-clause BSD licence (this part is included in the > binary JAR files); the run-time part under lib/python/ is covered > by the GNU GPL, version 3 or later (this part is not included in > the binary JAR files). See <a > href=https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=750643#80 > ">here</a> > for the full details.</p> > > That’s all from me on this, then. (Finally, we can go back to > hacking…) > > bye, > //mirabilos > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: wolfgang haefelinger <w...@haefelinger.it> > Message-ID: < > cafsqz9nhulfvv+7wvpdnk9kez1e84v4cosj_y91q9ec2wwd...@mail.gmail.com> > Sender: whaefelin...@gmail.com > To: Thorsten Glaser <t...@mirbsd.de> > Cc: 750...@bugs.debian.org > Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 12:03:59 +0200 > Subject: Re: Bug#750643: antlr: missing licence for PyANTLR > > Hello Debian, > > the PyAntlr extension of Antlr consists of two software parts: > > (1) A generator source code located in antlr/actions/python ; and a > (2) runt-time library located in lib/python > > I herewith declare, that > o part (1) has been released into the wild under the conditions of license > http://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause ; and further, that > o part (2) has been released into the wild under the conditions of license > GPL > version 3 or later (http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.txt) > > // Wolfgang Häfelinger > > > > > On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Thorsten Glaser <t...@mirbsd.de> wrote: > > > wolfgang haefelinger dixit: > > > > >Discussed this with the original author of Antlr. The lights are on red > > for > > >a new 2.7 release and I'm currently not willing to create a fork. > > > > Sure. Let’s just add editorial notes from Terence and you to clean up > > the licence situation. We will put that into debian/copyright, and you > > (Terence, probably) can put it up on the website, and that should be > > everything anyone could ever need. > > > > >which is why the “LICENSE.txt” of Antlr itself does not > > >> work for you. (Side fact: it’s misnamed because PD means absence of > > >> the need for a licence.) > > > > >What file name does Debian then propose? > > > > This is not about Debian (they do not ship those files anyway, but > > collect all licencing information in a central file) but about PD > > versus licences. But this does not matter – we’re not re-releasing, > > so we just put the updated info “somewhere”, and everything is good. > > > > Besides, with the proposed language I sent to Terence, there would > > be a licence, so this point is moot anyway. > > > > >> 1) antlr/actions/python/ > > >> 2) lib/python/ > > > > >My "statement" is then: > > > > > > o All source code packed with (1) is released in terms of the BSD > > software > > >license. > > > > That is one of these? > > * http://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause > > * http://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause > > > > > p All source code packed with (2) is released in terms of the GPL > > software > > >license. > > > > This also, unfortunately, has got several options… > > * GPL, any version > > * GPL version 2 only > > * GPL version 2 or later > > * GPL version 3 only > > * GPL version 3 or later > > * GPL version (1 or) 2 or 3 only > > > > >So, can you help me reformulate them so that they look proper and can be > > >used in an "official" statement? > > > > Yes, of course. Just solve the above choices ;-) > > > > >Second, how shall I transmit this statement to Debian? There is a > > >"half-backed" website [1] - maintained by me - where I could put those > > >license details. > > > > Just per eMail to this bugreport is enough. It would be good > > if you can PGP sign it, but that’s not been required until now. > > > > If you update a website, sure, put it up there. Otherwise, I’d > > suggest (once finished) you also send it to Terence, so it can > > be shown at the official Antlr site. > > > > Thanks for your patience! > > > > bye, > > //mirabilos > > -- > > <igli> exceptions: a truly awful implementation of quite a nice idea. > > <igli> just about the worst way you could do something like that, afaic. > > <igli> it's like anti-design. <mirabilos> that too… may I quote you on > > that? > > <igli> sure, tho i doubt anyone will listen ;) > > > > > > -- > Wolfgang Häfelinger > häfelinger IT - Applied Software Architecture > http://www.haefelinger.it > +49 1520 32 52 981 > (+31 648 27 61 59) > -- Dictation in use. Please excuse homophones, malapropisms, and nonsense.
