Your message dated Thu, 22 Dec 2005 13:48:25 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#251159: Bug still open?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 May 2004 07:34:51 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 27 00:34:51 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sky.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de [134.93.144.163]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BTFPf-00005b-00; Thu, 27 May 2004 00:34:51 -0700
Received: from harriet.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de (harriet.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de
[134.93.226.19])
by sky.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id
i4R7YnYt012013
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 27 May 2004 09:34:49 +0200
Received: from woodstock.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
[134.93.226.8])
by harriet.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with
ESMTP id i4R7YjXb032265
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL);
Thu, 27 May 2004 09:34:46 +0200
Received: from woodstock.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by woodstock.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with
ESMTP id i4R7Yjkl026528
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL);
Thu, 27 May 2004 09:34:45 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by woodstock.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) id
i4R7YjOe026526;
Thu, 27 May 2004 09:34:45 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Christoph Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: cl-tclink: should depend on libssl0.9.7
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.58
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 09:34:45 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: cl-tclink
Severity: important
please rebuild for sid/sarge agains libssl0.9.7. libssl0.9.6 is old
and will be removed.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 251159-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Dec 2005 21:48:27 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 22 13:48:27 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86]
helo=tennyson.dodds.net)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EpYIU-0000eI-Vv
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 13:48:27 -0800
Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id DF0997002; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 13:48:25 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 13:48:25 -0800
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Christoph Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#251159: Bug still open?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 03:01:28PM +0100, Christoph Martin wrote:
> Alexis Sukrieh schrieb:
> > I was looking for some RC bugs to close and found that one.
> > When I look to the debian/control file, I don't see any build-dependency
> > against libssl0.9.7, but a one against libssl-dev which is good.
> > Moreover, looking to the binary package in sid, I find that the
> > dependency is good:
> > Depends: libc6 (>=3D 2.3.5-1), libssl0.9.8, common-lisp-controller (>=3D
> > 3.37), cl-split-sequence, cl-uffi
> > So I guess that bug can be closed by hand, can't it?
> I think you have to wait some more time. It looks like someone did a non
> maintainer binary only upload:
> cl-tclink (3.3.1-3.0.1) unstable; urgency=3Dlow
> * Binary-only non-maintainer upload for i386; no source changes.
> * Rebuild with libssl0.9.8
> -- Debian/i386 Build Daemon <buildd_i386-cyberhq> Wed, 12 Oct 2005 02:0=
1:31 -0700
> But as you can see here the upload is missing for some archs:
Only on m68k, which was not queued simply because it was the last arch to
have sbuild fixed up for binNMU support. I've queued it there now, so AFAIK
this bug can be closed.
Thanks,
--=20
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDqx8pKN6ufymYLloRAs0VAJ0V3AqrjpIozC4uhB/GSwEa3bXtggCeJchB
ceXwoWlIPeeSi2WqOxgRgPo=
=Y0km
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
