Paul Gevers writes ("configuration files, ownership and dpkg-statoverride"):
> I am looking into dbconfig-common RC bug 720517 [1] and I was wondering
> what the general idea is of maintainer scripts changing the permissions
> and/or owners of configuration files and the use of dpkg-statoverride.The user should not be expected or required to use dpkg-statoverride on configuration files (whether they are dpkg-managed conffiles or maintainers-script-managed). chmod/chown should be sufficient. > I myself find it unacceptable that updating a package changes the > permissions/owners of a configuration file without asking, even when > I have not documented that fact with dpkg-statoverride. At least > that is how I read policy 10.7.3 [2]. I think you are right. But I don't see anyone disputing this. Also I don't see in your references an explanation from anyone as to why dbconfig-common does this. Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
