Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2014-10-26 19:14:23)
> Reclass 1.4 changes backwards-incompatibly its data format - 
> specifically changing default class name from "index" to "".
[...]
> Reclass 1.4-1 should therefore not enter testing before its reverse 
> dependency has been adapted to use the new ABI.
> 
> Alternatively, reclass could be adapted to support the previous 
> "index" as fallback when "init" does not exist: That would be adequate 
> for use by boxer, since the new "init" happens to not be used in the 
> boxer-data classes currently in Debian.

Update: I now released boxer-data 6 adapted to reclass 1.4 ABI.

I suggest the following plan:

 1) We keep this bug open and at high severity until we can reasonably
    estimate which packages will enter testing before freeze.
    (Release team probably announces when "freze - 10 days" is passed)
2a) If likely that both reclass and boxer-data will make it in time, we 
    close this bugreport.
2b) If likely that reclass will make it in time but not boxer-data, we
    keep this bugreport open and request freeze exception, referring to
    this bugreport as the reason.
 3) If estimate turned out to be wrong, we reopen this bugreport and 
    request freeze exception.

How does that plan sound to you?

 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: signature

Reply via email to