Hi, Vasudev Kamath <kamathvasu...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 5:04 PM, intrigeri <intrig...@debian.org> wrote: >> On current sid, with texlive-lang-indic installed: >> >> $ t1disasm >> /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/sanskrit/sktb10.pfb | grep >> start >> dup 3 {systemdict /internaldict known not {pop 3} {1183615869 >> systemdict /internaldict get exec dup /startlock known {/startlock >> get exec} {dup /strtlck known {/strtlck get exec} {pop 3} ifelse} >> ifelse} ifelse} executeonly put >> >> ... seems to indicate that the bug is still present. >> >> Did I miss anything, or are we misunderstanding each other? > > Below is mail snippet between me Jaldhar and Norbert, probably > recorded in texlive mailing list. > =========================================================================== > Hi Vasudev, > >> We (me and Jaldhar) are planning to drop the latex-sanskrit package from > > Ok. > >> Can you please drop the latex-sanskrit from depends/recommends of above >> package in your next release?.. > > Sure. We will re-include the "sanskrit" part of TeX Live which > only ships the mf /pfb files and the source of the preprocessor. > >> Also I will file bug on above 3 packages if needed, I thought I will >> first contact you guys before filing bug. Please let me know your >> thoughts on this. > > There is one thing we should think about: Transition for users of > latex-sanskrit. > > If you think it is fine to drop the package completely without > any upgrade path, that is fine with me. > > Otherwise we could build a transitional package "latex-sanskrit" > from texlive-lang that just depends on > texlive-lang-indic > and be gone. > > That way you don't have to request removal either, since it is > just a change of maintainer, and at the end will be removed > at some point. > > Let me know your opinion and I will implement it for TL 2014, > (which will probably never enter Debian if we don't get a new libpng) > =================================================================== > > We acked to drop binaries and only ship required source as part of > texlive-lang-indic. So yes the bug still holds right but not sure if > it should be reassigned to texlive-lang src or kept on latex-sanskrit. > Also bug is ignored for jessie!. > > Sorry for not including this earlier conversation. I had to re-read it > to understand the concept Any thing on this? Did I clarify? or any further clarification needed From my side? -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info Connect on ~friendica: copyni...@samsargika.copyninja.info IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net} GPG Key: C517 C25D E408 759D 98A4 C96B 6C8F 74AE 8770 0B7E
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature