On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Balint Reczey <bal...@balintreczey.hu> wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Aug 2014 20:08:21 +0100 "Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo"
> <manuel.montez...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I stumbled upon this bug by chance when looking at why it did not
>> compile in some new ports.
 It should compile on all of them by now. The buildd archive shows
that arm64 and ppc64el are fine, even mips and sparc.

>> I guess that it's better to just ask FTP masters to remove the
>> package, but I'll leave that to other people, since they were
>> interested in doing that in the past (all in copy now).
 Yes, I was about to ask its removal as upstream no longer supports
it. But it works correctly and I got personal mails that they would
still use it on low-end (embedded?) machines where sqlite3 would
require more CPU and/or memory.

> Filing bugs against reverse dependencies to migrate to sqlite 3 would be
> a better start IMO.
 I've mailed all of them some years ago, but there are still some use it.

> Probably it is too late to convert everything for Jessie:
 It is late.

> Dear Release Team, should this package be released with Jessie?
 I'm open for everything, but please do note that the removal would
mean removing the dependent packages as well.

Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to